
Article marketing versus PPC marketing Content and article marketing are highly popular method for beginner marketers to gain traffic. Despite occasional disdain from experienced PPC marketers, it is also a great long-term traffic generation method for experienced marketers and search engine experts. Offering 100% free traffic, contextual and buy-ready search placement, and the potential to prime a prospect for a sale before they even see your product landing page, it is no wonder that more marketers are investing on content marketing for their campaigns. However, there is a value question that is often raised -- is article marketing more cost-effective than a highly optimized PPC (pay-per-click) marketing campaign. The obvious answer, that article marketing is free no matter what doesn't quite cover things in this circumstance. While article marketing is completely free, it is often let down by the lack of growth potential that PPC marketing and other per-visit based marketing methods have access to. A major reason for marketers to invest in content marketing is its cost: $0. When engineered through search engine results, traffic is absolutely free and marketing an offer costs only the administrative and hardware fees. However, it is not particularly efficient. When there is money to spend, more effective marketing methods pop up overnight. For most article marketers, however, that is far from the point. Article marketing is a zero-cost marketing method, perfect for marketers that either do not have or cannot risk their startup capital. Article marketing gives marketers an immediate head start on their competitors, especially competing web presences that use their own hosting and content platform. The vast majority of article directories are adored by Google, Yahoo, and MSN, giving article marketers an instant advanced in the search engine results. Watch out for too much duplicate content if you use article marketing, pick the best platforms (your own blog, other blogs, article marketing sites, even social bookmarking) but most of all: have a strategy. So, is it article marketing versus PPC? Of course not, it’s never black or white. I guess, it’s like SEO and SEA: combining both gives the best results… What do you think? CommentRelated tweets
|
Last Comments
EventsLast event
Bloggers
Latest Videos
![]() ![]() Columns
Tagcloudseo a4uexpo search engine spain advertising ppc youtube london funny gmail facebook blogger analytics google wave microsoft social smx tools mobile twitter street view searchcowboys social media google earth sem sea maps blog search adwords business website news images streetview video google ads search engines google mapsMost Commented
|
Search
My BlogLogBlogroll |
© 2012 Searchcowboys.com - All Rights Reserved - All views and opinions expressed are those of the authors of Searchcowboys.
All trademarks, slogans, text or logo representation used or referred to in this website are the property of their respective owners. Sitemap
Comments (2)
Hi Stijn,
Looks like you're minimizing the 'administrative' cost of producing good, content & copy.
largely depends on the purpose of the article, the volume & viral potential. And mostly, good articles have more value potential then just a ppc-click, unless you're looking for a direct conversion.
so, it depends, but I wouldn't call it zero cost marketing.
Fri 19 Feb 2010, 22:23
Hi Tom, you're completely right about that. In fact, at a given point I was thinking about adding that producing relevant content and using it for traffic purposes of course has a cost, be it an indirect one: time and efforts. Good point, glad we agree, stay tuned for more ;)
Sat 20 Feb 2010, 12:25