Universal Search: Is SEO As We know It Over? (Guestpost)

Mon 6 July 2009 10:30, Editors

Universal Search: Is SEO As We know It Over? (Guestpost)

I first met Anne Kennedy in person at SES Amsterdam where she was the closing keynote speaker. But I could have met her on any other SES conference world wide, because Anne travels the world to speak at different places and to get her international contacts to work together.

Anne Kennedy founded Beyond Ink in 1997 to bring the fundamental principles of marketing communications to online media. She is now Managing partner and founder at Beyond Ink and a member of several boards in the industry, which makes her one of the most influential people around. Who better than Anne to talk about Universal search?

Universal-Blended-Integrated Search: Is SEO As We know It Over?

A couple of years ago search results pages were all 10 blue links and ranking in the top spots was mostly a matter of your on-page relevance and the authority granted to you by your inbound links.  Nowadays, SERPs list so many visuals – images, thumbnails, local maps and links, that a #1 organic ranking frequently appears just above the fold, if at all.

While it’s tempting to moan that SEO just isn’t what it used to be --  which it isn’t, of course -- let’s flip this around and look at all the ways we can attract searchers to our sites by putting our digital assets in gear.

Universal/Integrated/Blended search results are not that new. Here’s what a  search for “lighthouses” from the US in 2005 looked like:

(Image copyright Beyond Ink LLC. All rights reserved)

Yahoo!, then Microsoft Search, and Ask all served up similar results, some calling the new style “Blended” or “Integrated”. By 2007, a searcher could look up popular entertainment, and find out where to see it by entering a Toronto postal code in a field . . . in the result!

(Image copyright Beyond Ink LLC. All rights reserved).

A very worthy advance, no doubt, and a big step toward improving searchers’ experience. However, for those of us who toil in search marketing, the net effect of adding all those results before the first organic ranking has been to push that link to below the fold, rendering it not visible to searchers who don’t scroll; many do not bother.

On the next SERP, Look for the line marked “fold” on this search from 2005. While the #1 organic ranking is visible, where is #2? Anybody see #3?

(Image copyright Beyond Ink LLC. All rights reserved)

Moreover, the appearance of universal search results has changed the way searchers scan the links on a results page, as proved by recent eye tracking studies. The sought after “Golden Triangle” in the upper left has given way to searchers’ eyes landing on the first image in the results, often a thumbnail next to a link for an image or video. From there they look up or down, but they don’t start scanning at the top, unless of course the top ranked link has an image in it.

It’s not so much that a picture is worth a thousand words; it is that a picture will make us READ 1000 words.

That image could be a local search map as well. Take a look at this recent UK result for “kentucky fried chicken” (For the record, exporting greasy fast food was not, in my humble opinion, our best US effort)

Skipping over the first links, a navigational result, based on Google’s assumption that the search was for the KFC website, and the inevitable Wikipedia link, you will see videos, and then a map of KFC shops near London. This results pages has something for everyone, which is broadly brushed effort by Google to satisfy a variety of queries. You want to know about nutrition (no kidding) of KFC? Listen to the Colonel reminisce? Easy. And for those who hunger for where in London to find finger-lickin’ goodness with 11 secret herbs and spices, that map is hard to miss and likely to draw eyes first.

News counts, as well. Take a look at search from Holland for Michael Jackson, mourned these days by music lovers everywhere.
Michael Jackson is very big news right now. News results rightly appear first, and with a thumbnail. Even before reading the link, the image assures searchers they have found Michael Jackson links and they won’t have to go very far to view a fave Jackson video.

Clearly, Google is rolling out universal search results beyond North America. Search Engine Optimization isn’t over, but there are so many digital elements to rank that they may well push your first text to below the fold. Or your competitors’. Think about that!

Smart SEOs are cataloguing, tagging and wrapping relevant text around images and video thumbnails and adding such digital assets to formerly staid press releases. So I have to ask, instead of “universal” or “blended” or “integrated” search, isn’t it about time we just called it all universal marketing?


Comments (3)


  • Universal marketing? I am not sure, but I am sure that this article is thought provoking. Still, I am convinced that the way forward is for search engines to return accurate results for specific searches.

    Case in point: I just entered a search in Google for "private business clubs in new york" and Google told me that there are no private business clubs in new york, which is not true. I then entered the same search minus quotations and clicked on news and got a New York Times article entitled "The Clueless Wives Club."

    Isn't it time that search engines focus their results on page content to ensure that their users arrive at the relevant pages all of the time? Shouldn't the internet be much better that print advertising because it is the best way to match a customer with their desired product or service?

    Forget everything else and let's sort out target search so that we can capitalise, all of us, on target marketing.

    Ma 6 jul 2009, 13:58

    • Sanjay

    Sounds is good.

    The internet suffered a number of slowdowns as people the world over rushed to verify accounts of Michael Jackson's death.

    Read more here - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8120324.stm

    Di 7 jul 2009, 09:11

  • Seriously, why the hell is there a copyright notice under screenshots in this posts. (Image copyright Beyond Ink LLC. All rights reserved).

    I can make these easily myself... Seems unnecessary and totally distracted me from the content.
    I wonder if you can get copyright on screenshots of Google SERP's?
    Anybody and idea if possible, as I have a shitload stored on my harddrive :-)

    Wo 8 jul 2009, 09:33


  • HTML is not allowed. URLs are automatically clickable.
    * Email address is not shown


Last event


  • J-P De Clerck
    J-P De Clerck

    Profession: Customer-centric digi...

    Company: Conversionation

  • Sam Murray
    Sam Murray

    Profession: Senior Search Consultant

    Company: Verve Search

  • Susie Hood
    Susie Hood

    Profession: Head of Copywriting

    Company: Click Consult / SEO C...

  • Tom Bogaert
    Tom Bogaert

    Profession: Managing Partner

    Company: QueroMedia

Latest Videos



  • Lizette van der Laan
    Social Media Image

    Is it the real you, the witty you, the person who reads the most interesting articles, makes t...


Subscribe to SC Newsletter:

RSS Feed

Are you a bloggerFacebook


© 2016 Searchcowboys.com - All Rights Reserved - All views and opinions expressed are those of the authors of Searchcowboys.

All trademarks, slogans, text or logo representation used or referred to in this website are the property of their respective owners. Sitemap