
Italian Googlers might face 6 months The trial has been coming for quite a few months now, as we reported on the matter back in February but the actual trial is now starting. The prosecutors presented their case this Wednesday and asked for a six-month to a year sentences for the Googlers. The Google executives on trial are David Carl Drummond, the head of Google Italy's managing board at the time; George De Los Reyes, a board member who has since quit; Peter Fleitcher, in charge of privacy protection in Europe; and Arvind Desikan, head of videos for Europe. "I'll be represented by outside counsel. I believe that each of my 3 co-defendants has reached the same conclusion. As for me, I'm under clear instructions from my outside counsel not to set foot in Italy, at all. That's a tragedy, since I love Italy." The lawyers of the Google employees will defend the case December 14th. Comment |
Last Comments
EventsUpcoming event
Last event
Bloggers
![]() Columns
Tagcloudblogger interview privacy yandex gmail microsoft google earth images facebook google tools smx business social google matt cutts adwords social media baidu viral yahoo browser video sea europe twitter ses searchcowboys google maps seo realtime event a4uexpo website ppc search engine bing news ads google wave marketingMost Commented
AgendaMost Read
|
Search |
© 2013 Searchcowboys.com - All Rights Reserved - All views and opinions expressed are those of the authors of Searchcowboys.
All trademarks, slogans, text or logo representation used or referred to in this website are the property of their respective owners. Sitemap
Comments (2)
I am an Italian SEO based in London, and believe me my country is not as bad as Mr. Fleitcher's "outside counsel" is thinking.
Italy have few problems, that's a fact; but surely is a free country and Mr. Fleithcer doesn't risk to be prosecuted if he sets foot in Italy.
Vr 27 nov 2009, 12:08
I am sorry, but if he does not risk prosecution then why is there a trial currently underway. You may mean to imply that he won't actually face time for the matter on trial, but is that really a risk somebody would willingly take? No. If this matter is truly as important as the Italian courts seem to imply, then why/are? the posting parties, of this video being prosecuted or is this more of a blame the messenger and not the source?
Also to think of this in terms of establishing precedent it is very scary/dangerous in terms of what a hosting part will be responsible for. If the host is left responsible, then you are left in an environment where internal hosting censorship will occur, and censorship on the internet is widely considered a TERRIBLE idea. I apologize if this is in direct disagreement with anybody here but precedent is something that must be considered when trying cases and the effect that any judgment will have on future cases.
Vr 27 nov 2009, 16:13